Johnson v. Trump
Petitioner: Ruth Johnson
Respondent: Donald John Trump
Case Number: 8:2018cv02209
Filed: July 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Prince George's
Presiding Judge: Paula Xinis
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1973
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER dismissing case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 8/13/2018. (c/m 8/13/2018 aos, Deputy Clerk)
July 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Petition for Injunction) against Donald John Trump (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 84637032684), filed by Ruth Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter requesting assignment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kns, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Trump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Donald John Trump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ruth Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?