U.S Home Corporation et al v. Settlers Crossing L.L.C. et al
| U.S. Home Corporation |
| Settlers Crossing, L.L.C. and Steven B. Sandler |
| Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP, Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Greenberg Traurig LLP, O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, Lowenstein Sandler LLP and Goodell DeVries Leech and Dann, LLP |
| iStar Financial, Inc. |
| Lennar Corporation |
| 8:2018cv02428 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| 88888 |
| Gina L Simms |
| Paula Xinis |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Motion to Quash |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerard J Gaeng on behalf of Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP (Gaeng, Gerard) |
| Filing 15 Correspondence regarding ECF No. #8 from Leiv Blad. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 14 Correspondence re: ECF 7 from Kevin Feder (Roberts, David) |
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER SUSPENDING the briefing schedule ECF #12 until further notice by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 8/21/2018. (ozs, Chambers)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION /Joint Stipulation by O'Melveny & Myers, LLP (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Roberts, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David Kendall Roberts on behalf of O'Melveny & Myers, LLP (Roberts, David) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by iStar Financial, Inc..(Kuwana, Eric) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day for all Discovery and Related Scheduling. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 8/14/2018. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms for all Discovery and Related Scheduling. Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day no longer assigned to the case. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 8 Correspondence to Levi H. Blad (c/m 8/9/2018 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 7 Correspondence to Kevin D. Feder (c/m 8/9/2018 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:18-mc-00099. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Case transferred to the USDC for the District of Maryland, pursuant to Court Order entered 08/07/2018. Sent to Court by extraction. (jf) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Paula Xinis. Judge Deborah K. Chasanow no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE re #2 MOTION to Transfer Case / O'Melveny & Myers LLP's Motion to Transfer Joint Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action filed by ISTAR FINANCIAL, INC.. (Kuwana, Eric) |
|
MINUTE ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Petitioner O'Melveny & Myers, LLP's #2 Motion to Transfer. Petitioner O'Melveny & Myers moves for the transfer of Petitioners' Joint Motion to Quash Subpoenas to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, the Court from which the challenged subpoenas were issued. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(f) states that "[w]hen the court where compliance is required" -- in this case, the District of Columbia -- "did not issue the subpoena, it may transfer a motion under this rule to the issuing court" -- in this case, the District of Maryland -- "if the person subject to the subpoena consents or if the court finds exceptional circumstances." All of the Petitioners who are subject to the challenged subpoenas consent to the transfer of their pending Joint Motion to Quash to the District of Maryland. By no later than AUGUST 9, 2018, Respondent iStar Financial, Inc. shall file a response to this Motion explaining why, given the plain text of Rule 45 and Petitioners' consent, Petitioners' Motion should not be transferred. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/7/2018. (lcckk3)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Petitioner O'Melveny & Myers, LLP's #2 Motion to Transfer. Petitioner O'Melveny & Myers moves for the transfer of Petitioners' Joint Motion to Quash Subpoenas to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, the Court from which the challenged subpoenas were issued. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(f) states that "[w]hen the court where compliance is required" -- in this case, the District of Columbia -- "did not issue the subpoena, it may transfer a motion under this rule to the issuing court" -- in this case, the District of Maryland -- "if the person subject to the subpoena consents or if the court finds exceptional circumstances." All of the Petitioners who are subject to the challenged subpoenas consent to the transfer of their pending Joint Motion to Quash to the District of Maryland. In addition, Respondent iStar Financial, Inc. has filed a #5 Response to Petitioner's Motion to Transfer, indicating that it too consents to transfer. Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion to Transfer is GRANTED. Petitioners' Joint Motion to Quash is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. This matter is now closed. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/7/2018. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ISTAR FINANCIAL, INC.. (Kuwana, Eric) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric A. Kuwana on behalf of ISTAR FINANCIAL, INC. (Kuwana, Eric) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Transfer Case / O'Melveny & Myers LLP's Motion to Transfer Joint Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action by O'MELVENY & MEYRS LLP (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration of Linda S. Woolf, #3 Declaration of David G. Barger, #4 Declaration of David M. Wissert, #5 Declaration of David Marroso, #6 Declaration of Barry C. Greenberg, #7 Declaration of Louis J. Rouleau, #8 Text of Proposed Order, #9 Certificate of Service)(Feder, Kevin) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Respondent iStar Financial, Inc. Response due by 8/15/2018. Petitioners' Reply due by 8/22/2018. (dot) |
|
MINUTE ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Petitioners Goodell De Vries Leech and Dann, LLP, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP, and Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP's #1 Joint Motion to Quash Subpoena. Respondent iStar Financial, Inc. shall file a response to this Motion by no later than AUGUST 15, 2018. Petitioners shall file a reply by no later than AUGUST 22, 2018. Given that counsel for Respondent have not yet entered an appearance in this case, the Clerk of the Court shall mail and e-mail a copy of this Order to the addresses for said counsel provided in Petitioners' Certificate of Service (ECF No. 1-10). Petitioners are also ORDERED to ensure that a copy of this Order is served on the Respondent. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/2/2018. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action by GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH AND DANN, LLP, GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP, LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP, O'MELVENY & MEYRS LLP, ROSENBERG MARTIN GREENBERG LLP, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Declaration Linda Woolf, #4 Declaration David G. Garger, #5 Declaration Joseph A. Fischetti, #6 Declaration David Roberts, #7 Declaration Barry C. Greenberg, #8 Declaration Louis J. Rouleau, #9 Text of Proposed Order, #10 Certificate of Service)(ztd) |
| Filing fee received: $ 47, receipt number: 4616093794. (ztd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
