Powell v. Berryhill
| Jacobi Symon Powell |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| SSA Notify |
| 8:2018cv02531 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| St. Mary's |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| Roger W Titus |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 8/22/2018. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued 60 days as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Clerk to prepare and issue summons. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 8/17/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Vickie LeDuc on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jacobi Symon Powell(Murahari, Arjun) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Jacobi Symon Powell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Murahari, Arjun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
