Ishmell v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
James Ishmell, Jr. |
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority |
8:2018cv02793 |
September 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Paul W Grimm |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Consent Motion to Extend the Scheduling Order; Status Report Due: 6/30/2019. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/11/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Scheduling Order by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority(Allison, Sarah) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER MEMORIALIZING Today's conference call and directing the parties to file a revised scheduling order with the dates as discussed on the call by October 9, 2018. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/1/18. (lmys, Chambers) |
Filing 10 Disclosure of Damages by James Ishmell, Jr(Rosenberg, Brian) Modified on 9/25/2018 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 9 DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(kns, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 2/25/2019.. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/17/2018. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER SCHEDULING Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 telephone conference call on October 1, 2018 AT 3:00PM AND DIRECTING Plaintiff's counsel to initiate the call to chambers or circulate a conference call number to the parties. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/17/2018. (ats, Chambers) |
Filing 6 Correspondence re: statement regarding removal (Allison, Sarah) |
Filing 5 Letter Order Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/11/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/10/2018. (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.(km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The Circuit Court for Prince George's County, Maryland, case number CAL 18-23053. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 84637032995), filed by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint from State Court, #3 Exhibit A- Civil Case Information Report from State Court, #4 Writ of Summons from State Court)(km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ishmell v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority | |
Represented By: | Sarah Allison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Ishmell, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Brian Rosenberg |
Represented By: | Adam Ryan Leighton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.