Martinez et al v. Martinez et al
| Debora Martinez, Yudis Rubio, Anibal Ramirez and Edwin Gustavo Martinez |
| Richard Emovovo Ogom, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Arnoldo Martinez |
| 8:2018cv02894 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Consent Motion to Consolidate Related Cases; consolidating Civil Nos. RWT 18-2136, GJH 18-2894 and GJH 18-2882; stating that all future filings by any party shall be filed in Civil No. RWT 18-2136; and that the United States shall respond to the consolidated action by 11/14/2018. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 10/31/2018. (tds, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Case associated: Create association to 8:18-cv-02136-RWT. (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
| THIS IS A CONSOLIDATED CASE. PLEASE DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE OR SPREAD TEXT IN THIS CASE. ALL SUBSEQUENT PLEADINGS ARE TO BE ELECTRONICALLY FILED ONLY IN THE LEAD CASE (RWT-18-cv-2136). (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Richard Emovovo Ogom, The United States of America (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cusson, Evelyn) |
| Filing 13 Summons Issued 21 days as to Arnoldo Martinez.(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Debora Martinez, Edwin Gustavo Martinez, Anibal Ramirez, Yudis Rubio, Yudis Rubio, Yudis Rubio re #1 Notice of Removal,, Proposed Summons (Schwartz, Ronald) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 103.5 FILING OF NO ADDITIONAL STATE COURT PAPERS(Cusson, Evelyn) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 10/16/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Substitute Party. Richard Emovovo Ogom terminated. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 10/16/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 10/17/2018 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk).
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald Lee Schwartz on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Schwartz, Ronald) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE re #5 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by Richard Emovovo Ogom, The United States of America.(Cusson, Evelyn) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Arnoldo Martinez (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Document) (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 9/19/2018. (c/m 9/19/18 km4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Substitute Party by Richard Emovovo Ogom, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Cusson, Evelyn) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time by Richard Emovovo Ogom, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cusson, Evelyn) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5(Cusson, Evelyn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, case number 050200198332018., filed by THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Richard Emovovo Ogom. (Attachments: #1 CIVIL COVER SHEET, #2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL, #3 Exhibit 1_Complaint (#1), #4 Exhibit 1 (continued)_Complaint (#2), #5 Exhibit 1 (continued)_Complaint (#3 Amended), #6 Exhibit 1 (continued)_Writ Of Summons, #7 Exhibit 2_Scope Certification)(Cusson, Evelyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
