Iguodala v. Webb et al
| Brown E. Iguodala |
| State of Maryland, Stuart Nathan and Wayne Webb |
| 8:2018cv02966 |
| September 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Clerk to mail this Order with 3 copies of U.S Marshal forms to Plaintiff; Granting Plaintiff 21 days from the date of this Order to complete and return the Marshal forms to the Clerk with service copies of Complaint and Supplement of the Complaint; Directing Clerk to issue summons upon receipt of U.S Marshal forms and service copies; and Directing U.S Marshal to effectuate service of process. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 11/7/2018. (c/m 11/7/18 km4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 Supplemental to #1 Complaint (Amended of Complaint) filed by Brown E. Iguodala (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting Plaintiff 28 days to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 10/1/2018. (c/m w/ forms 10/1/18 nu, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brown E. Iguodala (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stuart Nathan, State of Maryland, and Wayne Webb filed by Brown E. Iguodala. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment, #3 Summons)(km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
