Rogers v. Chapman
Matthew Rogers |
Eric Chapman |
8:2018cv03154 |
October 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Paul W Grimm |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Eric Chapman (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 14 LETTER ORDER memorializing the telephone conference held 11/28/2018; authorizing the United States to file a Motion to Dismiss by December 7 2018. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/28/2018. (c/m 11/28/2018 - jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 13 LETTER ORDER scheduling a pre-motion telephone conference on November 28, 2018 at 11:00 AM. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/14/2018. (c/m 11/14/2018 - jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 (FILED IN ERROR - PER CHAMBERS) LETTER ORDER scheduling a pre-motion telephone conference for November 26, 2018 at 1:30 PM. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/14/2018. (c/m 11/14/2018 - jf3s, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 11/14/2018 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 11 Local Rule 103.5 Certification (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 10 Correspondence re: Defendant's Request to File Motion to Dismiss (Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE re #5 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by Eric Chapman.(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Substitute Party by Eric Chapman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time as follows: Defendant's response to the Complaint is now due 11/13/18. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/15/2018. (sb2, Chambers) |
Filing 6 Removal Notification Letter (c/m 10/12/18 km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/12/2018. (c/m 10/12/18 km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Letter Order Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/12/2018. (c/m to Plaintiff 10/12/2018 - jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Case Assigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time by Eric Chapman (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5 Filing of State Court Papers(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Maryland for Prince George's County, case number 050200270342018., filed by Eric Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Summons, #4 Complaint, #5 Certification)(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rogers v. Chapman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew Rogers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Eric Chapman | |
Represented By: | Kelly M Marzullo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.