Tchatchou v. India Globalization Capital, Inc. et al
| Alde-Binet Tchatchou |
| India Globalization Capital, Inc., Richard Prins, Sudhakar Shenoy and Ram Mukunda |
| 8:2018cv03396 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as follows: the deadline for Defendants to answer the Complaint or file a responsive motion is suspended during the notice period under 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3) and until further notice. To ensure that the case progresses with due diligence, the parties shall provide joint status reports to the Court every 45 days from the date of this Paperless Order until such time as the Court reestablishes deadlines for answers or responsive motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/19/2018. (sb2, Chambers)
|
| Filing 11 QC NOTICE: #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Ram Mukunda, Richard Prins, India Globalization Capital, Inc. was filed incorrectly. **A motion and proposed order must be filed separately. The motion should be filed as the main document and proposed order as separate attachments to the main document. Your document has been accepted as filed. No corrective action is required in regard to this filing. (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by India Globalization Capital, Inc., Ram Mukunda, Richard Prins(Feinberg, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by India Globalization Capital, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate IGC - Mauritius, Other Affiliate Techni Bharathi Private Limited, Other Affiliate India Mining and Trading Private Limited, Other Affiliate IGC Materials Private Limited, Other Affiliate IGC Logistic Private Limited, Other Affiliate IGC Enterprises Limited, Other Affiliate Cabaran Ultima Sdn. Bhd. for India Globalization Capital, Inc..(Feinberg, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Edward Feinberg on behalf of India Globalization Capital, Inc., Ram Mukunda, Richard Prins (Feinberg, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Alde-Binet Tchatchou. Ram Mukunda waiver sent on 11/20/2018, answer due 1/22/2019.(Katz, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Alde-Binet Tchatchou. India Globalization Capital, Inc. waiver sent on 11/20/2018, answer due 1/22/2019.(Katz, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Alde-Binet Tchatchou. Sudhakar Shenoy waiver sent on 11/20/2018, answer due 1/22/2019.(Katz, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Alde-Binet Tchatchou. Richard Prins waiver sent on 11/20/2018, answer due 1/22/2019.(Katz, Daniel) |
|
Filing 3
LETTER ORDER Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/5/2018. (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to India Globalization Capital, Inc., Ram Mukunda, Richard Prins, Sudhakar Shenoy.(hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against India Globalization Capital, Inc., Ram Mukunda, Richard Prins, Sudhakar Shenoy filed by Alde-Binet Tchatchou. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7650635) (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Case assigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
