Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. 30800, LLC et al
Choice Hotels International, Inc. |
Universal Sands, LLC, 30800, LLC and Remo Polselli |
8:2018cv03400 |
November 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Paul W Grimm |
Gina L Simms |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Judgment by Confession by Choice Hotels International, Inc. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 JUDGMENT in favor of Choice Hotels International, Inc. against 30800, LLC, Universal Sands, LLC, Remo Polselli. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 12/4/2018. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms for reviewing a complaint for judgment by confession. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/5/2018. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Confessed Judgment against 30800, LLC, Remo Polselli, and Universal Sands, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 84637033321.), filed by Choice Hotels International, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit of Gery F. Brown, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Notice of Entry of Judgement by Confession, #6 Notice of Entry of Judgement by Confession, #7 Notice of Entry of Judgement by Confession, #8 Text of Proposed Order, #9 Text of Proposed Order) (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.