Liu v. Bushnell et al
Xunxian Liu |
David Shurtleff, Evelyn Cusson and Mary Catherine Bushnell |
8:2018cv03468 |
November 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Paul W Grimm |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 LETTER ORDER Granting #14 Defendant's Motion to Continue Pre-Motion Conference Call; the Pre-Motion call is now scheduled to take place on January 22, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/28/2018. (c/m 12/28/2018 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Continue Pre-Motion Conference by Mary Catherine Bushnell, Evelyn Cusson, David Shurtleff (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 13 LETTER ORDER that the Court has Schedule a pre-motion Telephone Conference call on January 2, 2018 at 3:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/18/2018. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 Correspondence re: Request to File Motion to Dismiss (Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 11 SECOND RESPONSE re #5 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by Xunxian Liu. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rss, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #5 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by Xunxian Liu. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 LETTER ORDER to parties. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/28/2018. (c/m 11/28/2018 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Discovery Order by Xunxian Liu (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time as follows: Defendants' response to the Complaint is due 12/17/18. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/16/2018. (sb2s, Chambers) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by Mary Catherine Bushnell, Evelyn Cusson, David Shurtleff.(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 5 Standing Order Concerning Removal re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by David Shurtleff, Mary Catherine Bushnell, Evelyn Cusson. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/15/2018. (c/m 11/15/2018 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 LETTER ORDER Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/13/2018. (c/m 11/16/18 km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Mary Catherine Bushnell, Evelyn Cusson, David Shurtleff (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5 Filing of State Court Papers(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Montgomery County, case number 455587-V., filed by Mary Catherine Bushnell, Evelyn Cusson, David Shurtleff. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Summons to Bushnell as filed in State Court, #4 Summons to Shurleff as filed in State Court, #5 Summons to Cusson as filed in State Court, #6 Complaint as filed in State Court, #7 Civil Case Information Sheet as filed in State Court, #8 Letter from Court Assigning Case Number as filed in State Court, #9 Scheduling Notice as filed in State Court, #10 Order for Mandatory Scheduling Conference as filed in State Court, #11 Scheduling Order as filed in State Court, #12 Request for Interpreter as filed in State Court)(Marzullo, Kelly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Theodore D. Chuang. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Case reassigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. Judge Theodore D. Chuang no longer assigned to the case. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.