Conteh v. PG Cpunty Police Dept et al
| Jeremiah A Conteh |
| State of Maryland, PG County Police Dept and PG County Circuit Court |
| 8:2018cv03785 |
| December 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by State of Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Record)(Jawor, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel John Jawor on behalf of State of Maryland (Jawor, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 Correspondence by Jeremiah A Conteh (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(sp2, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 1/2/2019 (sp2, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Respondent to file an Answer to the Petition within 40 days; directing the Respondent to provide relevant documents to Petitioner. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/21/2018. (c/m 12/21/18 sp2, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Respondent to file an Answer to Petition within 40 days. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/20/2018. (c/m&e 12/21/18 sp2, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 12/21/2018 (sp2, Deputy Clerk).
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jeremiah A Conteh. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sp2, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
