Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Cumberland et al
| Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. |
| Patsy D. Cumberland and Richard Dodd |
| 8:2019cv00067 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Peter J Messitte |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.. Richard Dodd served on 3/7/2019, answer due 3/28/2019.(Schreiber, Martin) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Patsy D. Cumberland, Richard Dodd.(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Case reassigned to Judge Peter J. Messitte. Judge George Levi Russell, III no longer assigned to the case. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Ditech Holding Corp. for Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc..(Schreiber, Martin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet and Summonses to be stamped by Clerk (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Schreiber, Martin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7768154.), filed by Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit D)(Schreiber, Martin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
