An et al v. East West Wellness Center, Inc. et al
| Yu Larry An and Meng-Al An |
| Hong Ji, East West Wellness Center, Inc., Dr. Hong Ji and Mary Hong Ji Ma |
| 8:2019cv00102 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Remand Notification Letter sent to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (cs 02/25/2019 - jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Remand to State Court; remanding this case to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland; directing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 2/22/2019. (cs 02/25/2019 - jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Meng-Al An, Yu Larry An (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Utterback, Amanda) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; stating that the Court will not grant leave to file the Motion to Dismiss until after: (1) Plaintiffs file a Motion to Remand and such Motion is resolved; or (2) the 30-day period for filing a Motion to Remand expires; and stating that if Plaintiffs choose to file a Motion to Remand, they may do so WITHOUT first filing a Notice of Intent under the Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 1/14/2019. (tds, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 1/10/2019. (tds, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by East West Wellness Center, Inc., Hong Ji re #1 Notice of Removal Civil Cover Sheet (Murphy, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE (State Court Complaint) by East West Wellness Center, Inc. and Hong Ji re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Information Report, #2 Notice of Removal to the United States District court for the District of Maryland)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal filed by East West Wellness Center, Inc. and Hong Ji was filed with the following attachment missing - Civil Cover Sheet. To correct this problem, file Civil Cover Sheet using the event Notice (Other) and link Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Notice of Removal. **For future notice a Notice of Removal and supporting documents must be filed separately. The Notice of Removal should be filed as the main document and the supporting documents as a separate attachment to the main document (ie. State Complaint, Summons, Answer etc.) (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 1/11/2019. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a ClaimPartial Preliminary Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Punitive Damages Claim by East West Wellness Center, Inc., Hong Ji(Murphy, John) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by East West Wellness Center, Inc., Hong Ji (Murphy, John) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint and Jury Demand by East West Wellness Center, Inc., Hong Ji.(Murphy, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Civil Action from Montgomery County Circuit Court, case number 458487-V. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7775223), filed by Hong Ji, East West Wellness Center, Inc..(Murphy, John) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Theodore D. Chuang. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
