Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. T & L Communications, Inc. et al
| Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund and Trustees of the International Training Fund |
| T & L Communications, Inc., Catherine Louise Bushaw and Lawrence E. Bushaw |
| 8:2019cv00476 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. Catherine Louise Bushaw served on 3/6/2019, answer due 3/27/2019.(Gilligan, Charles) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. Lawrence E. Bushaw served on 3/6/2019, answer due 3/27/2019.(Gilligan, Charles) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. T & L Communications, Inc. served on 3/6/2019, answer due 3/27/2019.(Gilligan, Charles) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Catherine Louise Bushaw, Lawrence E. Bushaw and T & L Communications, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund (Gilligan, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Catherine Louise Bushaw, Lawrence E. Bushaw, T & L Communications, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7845346.), filed by Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons For T & L Communications, Inc., #3 Summons For Lawrence E. Bushaw, #4 Summons For Catherine Louise Bushaw, #5 Exhibit A)(Gilligan, Charles) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/15/2019: #6 Complaint) (kns, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
