McDonald v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
| Richard McDonald |
| Asst. Warden Walter West, Brian Frosh and Commissioner of Corrections |
| 8:2019cv00825 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Commissioner of Corrections, Brian Frosh, Walter West. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Doyle, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 5/10/2019. (c/m 5/10/19 sp2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Commissioner of Corrections, Brian Frosh, Walter West (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Doyle, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
Supplemental to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard McDonald (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sp2, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Respondent to file an Answer to Petition within 40 days;. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 3/29/2019. (c/m&e 3/29/19 sp2s, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/29/2019: #1 Main Document) (sp2s, Deputy Clerk).
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Richard McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sp2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
