Tipton v Berryhill
| Freda M Tipton |
| SSC Nancy A. Berryhill |
| SSA Notify |
| 8:2019cv01439 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| Paula Xinis |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued 60 days as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Meredith E Marcus. Directing attorney Meredith E Marcus to use the attorney's existing CM/ECF login and password previously issued in this Court. The account password can be reset at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-password-reset. Signed by Clerk on 5/17/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3
Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 5/17/2019. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Meredith E. Marcus (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8017640.) by Freda M Tipton(Murahari, Arjun) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8017623.), filed by Freda M Tipton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Murahari, Arjun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
