Oladipupo v. Morgan
| Warden Morgan |
| Lamy Oladipupo and Larry A. Oladipupo |
| 8:2019cv01860 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to and including September30,2019. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/16/2019. (c/m 8/16/19 nu, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jawor, Daniel)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 84637034762 (sp2, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel John Jawor on behalf of Morgan (Jawor, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to amend the docket; denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Petitioner IS GRANTED twenty-eight days to pay the filing fee or file a completed, signed, and dated Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis;. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 7/11/2019. (c/m w/forms 7/12/19 nu, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lamy Oladipupo (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nu, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Lamy Oladipupo. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nu, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
