Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Omaha Sprinkler Company et al
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund and Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments and Extended Benefit Fund
Defendant: Omaha Sprinkler Company, Omaha Sprinkler Company d/b/a Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company and Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company
Case Number: 8:2019cv02089
Filed: July 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Theodore D Chuang
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Omaha Sprinkler Company. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(heps, Deputy Clerk)
August 13, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments and Extended Benefit Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. (Gilligan, Charles)
August 12, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments and Extended Benefit Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company served on 7/27/2019, answer due 8/19/2019.(Gilligan, Charles)
August 12, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments and Extended Benefit Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. Omaha Sprinkler Company served on 7/27/2019, answer due 8/19/2019.(Gilligan, Charles)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 7/18/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
July 18, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company and Omaha Sprinkler Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
July 16, 2019 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments and Extended Benefit Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund (Gilligan, Charles)
July 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company, Omaha Sprinkler Company, Omaha Sprinkler Company d/b/a Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8127201.), filed by Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments and Extended Benefit Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons To Omaha Sprinkler Company d/b/a Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company, #3 Summons To Omaha Sprinkler Company, #4 Summons To Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company, #5 Exhibit A)(Gilligan, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Omaha Sprinkler Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the International Training Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments and Extended Benefit Fund
Represented By: Charles W Gilligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omaha Sprinkler Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omaha Sprinkler Company d/b/a Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acme Omaha Sprinkler Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?