Alvarez et al v. TerraForm Power, LLC et al
| Charles P Spiliotis, Peter J Keel and Michael U Alvarez |
| TerraForm Power, LLC and TerraForm Power, Inc. |
| 8:2019cv02111 |
| July 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by TerraForm Power, Inc., TerraForm Power, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal,,, Civil Cover Sheet (Levy, Harry) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ciircuit Court for Montgomery County, case number 466765-V. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8132319), filed by TerraForm Power, LLC, TerraForm Power, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Non-Domestic Case Information Report, #3 Scheduling Notice, Order of Court-Track 3, Order for Mandatory Settlement Conference-Pretrial Hearing-Track3 & Scheduling Order, #4 Writ of Summons, #5 Scheduling Notice, Order of Court-Track 3, Order for Mandatory Settlement Conference-Pretrial Hearing-Track 3 @ Scheduling Order, #6 Affidavit of Service, #7 Motion for Special Admission of Out-of-State Attorney Pro Hac Vice, #8 Consent to Removal by TerraForm Power, Inc., #9 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal (filed in Circuit Court for Montgomrty County, Maryland))(Levy, Harry) |
| Case Assigned to Judge George Jarrod Hazel. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
