S.F. et al v. Smith et al
| J. F. and S. F. |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Dr. Jack R. Smith and Jack R. Smith |
| 8:2019cv02207 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER memorializing today's conference call with counsel. The parties will be filing cross motions for summary judgment under Local Rule 105.2(c). Plaintiff will file a motion for summary judgment by December 2, 2019. Defendants will file a combined opposition and cross motion for summary judgment by January 17, 2020. Plaintiff will file a combined reply and opposition by February 18, 2020. Defendants will file a reply by March 19, 2020. Each party will have 55 pages of substantive briefing total across all submissions, excluding exhibits. The parties are directed to please highlight relevant portions of the exhibits to aid the Court's review. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/20/2019. (pk3s, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Manisha S Kavadi on behalf of All Defendants (Kavadi, Manisha)
|
|
Filing 12
DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Order Protocol)(heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 2/12/2020. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/22/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER SCHEDULING Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 telephone conference call on September 20, 2019 at 1:30pm AND DIRECTING Plaintiff's counsel to initiate the call to chambers or circulate a conference call number to the parties. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/23/2019. (ats, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 9
Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Montgomery County Board of Education, Jack R. Smith (Rachlin, Emily)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Montgomery County Board of Education, Jack R. Smith.(Rachlin, Emily)
|
|
Filing 7
Administrative Record of Proceedings. (heps, Deputy Clerk)(filed separately under seal)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Consent Motion to Proceed Anonymously. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 7/31/2019. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter Order Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 7/31/2019. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued 21 days as to Montgomery County Board of Education, Jack R. Smith.(ybs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint, filed by S. F., J. F. was filed incorrectly. **Not all attorneys listed as counsel have signed the document. Court staff has entered the appearance of only the attorneys who have signed the document. All other attorneys must enter their own entries of appearance. (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
Consent MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND TO SEAL THE COMPLAINT AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by J. F., S. F.(A minor by her parents and next friends), S. F. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Complaint)(Eig, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Jack R. Smith ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8149516.), filed by S. F.(A minor by her parents and next friends), J. F., S. F.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Eig, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
