Reese v. Variante Investment Group, Inc

Plaintiff: Denise N. Reese
Defendant: Variante Investment Group, Inc
Case Number: 8:2019cv02325
Filed: August 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Paul W Grimm
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2019 Filing 8 Supplemental to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Variante Investment Group, Inc (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment, #3 Attachment, #4 Attachment, #5 Attachment, #6 Attachment)(Einstein, Joy)
August 13, 2019 CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number 0416-8176805(Einstein, Joy)
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/13/2019. (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
August 13, 2019 Filing 6 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Variante Investment Group, Inc was filed incorrectly. ** The case of Reese v. Variante Investment Group, Inc., has been opened in the District of Maryland. The case number is 8:19-cv-02325-PWG. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within 48 hours. To pay online, select the event Civil Case Filing Fee which is found under Civil Events --> Other Filings --> Other Documents. Otherwise, forward a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and note the assigned case number on the check or cover letter. (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
August 13, 2019 Filing 5 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Variante Investment Group, Inc was filed incorrectly. **Each state court document (i.e., complaint, summons, etc.) must be properly labeled. Please refile each attachment using the "Other Documents" category, select the "Supplemental" event, and link filing to 1 Notice of Removal. The first labeled attachment can be the main document and the other labeled documents as separate attachments. File any pending motions as separate docket entries. (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
August 13, 2019 THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (4) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY. (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
August 13, 2019 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Variante Investment Group, Inc, filed by Denise N. Reese.(ybs, Deputy Clerk)
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Letter Order Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/9/2019. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
August 13, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
August 13, 2019 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Variante Investment Group, Inc (Einstein, Joy)
August 13, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Circuit Court, case number 466971-V., filed by Variante Investment Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Einstein, Joy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reese v. Variante Investment Group, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise N. Reese
Represented By: Jason Shafer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Variante Investment Group, Inc
Represented By: Joy Einstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?