Knightsbridge Systems LLC v. DKW Communications, Inc.
| Knightsbridge Systems LLC |
| DKW Communications, Inc. |
| 8:2019cv02381 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Default Judgment; DEFAULT JUDGMENT entered in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $320,482.68. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 4/2/2020. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 4/2/2020. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 10 Correspondence re: Request for Final Judgment Based Upon Default (Schwager, Stuart) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to DKW Communications, Inc. by Knightsbridge Systems LLC (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Schwager, Stuart) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFAULT as to DKW Communications, Inc. (c/m 10/16/2019 bus, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to DKW Communications, Inc. (c/m 10/16/2019 bus, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default for want of answer or other defense by Knightsbridge Systems LLC (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Schwager, Stuart) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Knightsbridge Systems LLC. DKW Communications, Inc. served on 8/27/2019, answer due 9/17/2019.(Schwager, Stuart) |
| Filing 4 QC NOTICE: #3 Affidavit of Service filed by Knightsbridge Systems LLC was filed using the incorrect docketing event. **Please re-file documents by selecting Service of Process - Summons Returned Executed. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 (FILED IN ERROR) AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on DKW Communications, Inc. upon Resident Agent CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Serivce Company on August 27, 2019, filed by Knightsbridge Systems LLC.(Schwager, Stuart) Modified on 9/12/2019 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to DKW Communications, Inc.(dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Confirmation of Arbitration Award and for Judgment against Knightsbridge Systems LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8185317.), filed by Knightsbridge Systems LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Schwager, Stuart) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Knightsbridge Systems LLC v. DKW Communications, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Knightsbridge Systems LLC | |
| Represented By: | Theodore R Goldstock |
| Represented By: | Stuart Alan Schwager |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DKW Communications, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
