Hencin et al v. Avant Diagnostics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ronald S. Hencin and Glenn D. Hoke
Defendant: Avant Diagnostics, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2019cv02546
Filed: September 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: George Jarrod Hazel
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Avant Diagnostics, Inc..(Bhattacharya, Koushik)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 10/15/2019. (jw2s, Chambers)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER finding as moot #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 10/15/2019. (jw2s, Chambers)
October 14, 2019 Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint by Avant Diagnostics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bhattacharya, Koushik)
October 2, 2019 Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Ronald S. Hencin, Glenn D. Hoke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Circuit Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Asset Purchase Agreement, #4 Exhibit C - Disclosure Schedules to Asset Purchase Agreement, #5 Exhibit D - Affidavit of Glenn D. Hoke, #6 Exhibit E - Affidavit of Ronald S. Hencin, #7 Exhibit F - Form W-2 for Ronald s. Hencin, #8 Exhibit G - Form W-2 for Glenn D. Hoke, #9 Exhibit June 16, 2016 E-Mail, #10 Exhibit I - June 28, 2016 E-Mail, #11 Exhibit J - July 5, 2016 E-Mail, #12 Text of Proposed Order)(Orenstein, Jeffrey)
September 25, 2019 Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Ronald S. Hencin, Glenn D. Hoke (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Orenstein, Jeffrey)
September 11, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Avant Diagnostics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Bhattacharya, Koushik)
September 10, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE by Avant Diagnostics, Inc. Joint Statement Concerning Removal (Bhattacharya, Koushik)
September 6, 2019 Filing 8 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Ronald S. Hencin, Glenn D. Hoke (Orenstein, Jeffrey)
September 5, 2019 Filing 7 Supplemental to #1 Notice of Removal filed by Avant Diagnostics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons state court summons, #2 state court notice of new case number, #3 state court scheduling order, #4 state court sched notice and order, #5 state court order for settlement conference)(Bhattacharya, Koushik)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 9/5/2019. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
September 5, 2019 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Avant Diagnostics, Inc., filed by Glenn D. Hoke, Ronald S. Hencin.(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
September 5, 2019 Filing 4 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Avant Diagnostics, Inc. was filed incorrectly. **Each state court document (i.e., complaint, summons, etc.) must be properly labeled and filed as separate attachments. Please refile each attachment using the "Other Documents" category, select the "Supplemental" event, and link filing to 1 Notice of Removal. The first labeled attachment can be the main document and the other labeled documents as separate attachments. File any pending motions as separate docket entries. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
September 5, 2019 THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
September 4, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE by Avant Diagnostics, Inc. Civil Cover Sheet (Bhattacharya, Koushik)
September 4, 2019 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Avant Diagnostics, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Avant Diagnostics, Inc., Other Affiliate AVDX Investors Group, LLC for Avant Diagnostics, Inc..(Bhattacharya, Koushik)
September 4, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD, case number V469500. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8213605), filed by Avant Diagnostics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Bhattacharya, Koushik)
September 4, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge George Jarrod Hazel. (ko, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hencin et al v. Avant Diagnostics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Avant Diagnostics, Inc.
Represented By: Koushik Bhattacharya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald S. Hencin
Represented By: Jeffrey M Orenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glenn D. Hoke
Represented By: Jeffrey M Orenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?