Key v. Allen
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Key
Defendant: David T. Allen
Case Number: 8:2019cv02922
Filed: October 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Theodore D Chuang
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #9 Motion to Dismiss WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Case Management Order states that [n]o motions may be filed without first seeking a pre-motion conference with the Court. Case Management Order II.A.1, ECF No. 4. Defendant Allen has not sought a pre-motion conference with the Court. Accordingly, Defendant Allen is directed to file a Notice of Intent to File a Motion pursuant to section II.A.2 of the Case Management Order by December 4, 2019. A pre-motion conference will be separately noticed. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 11/27/2019. (hos, Chambers)
November 18, 2019 Filing 10 Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion To Dismiss the Defamation Complaint of Plaintiff Elizabeth A. Key by David T. Allen (Attachments: #1 Exhibit No. 1)(Ripke, Booth) Modified on 11/21/2019 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk).
November 18, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss the Defamation Complaint of Plaintiff Elizabeth A. Key by David T. Allen (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ripke, Booth)
November 18, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Booth Marcus Ripke on behalf of David T. Allen (Ripke, Booth)
November 18, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by James Gerhardt Fegan, III on behalf of Elizabeth Key (Fegan, James)
November 8, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elizabeth Key. David T. Allen served on 10/29/2019, answer due 11/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Proof of Service of Deputy D. Moore, #2 Attachment Exhibit A - Affidavit of Service of Deputy D. Moore)(Evans, Richard)
October 18, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard W Evans on behalf of Elizabeth Key (Evans, Richard)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 10/16/2019. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to David T. Allen.(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
October 7, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Theodore D. Chuang. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
October 4, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard W Evans on behalf of Elizabeth Key (Evans, Richard)
October 4, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David T. Allen ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8276183.), filed by Elizabeth Key. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons to Defendant David T. Allen)(Evans, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Key v. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David T. Allen
Represented By: Booth Marcus Ripke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Key
Represented By: Richard W Evans
Represented By: James Gerhardt Fegan, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?