Murphy v. Saul
| Tammy Murphy |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Notify |
| 8:2019cv03614 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Deborah K Chasanow |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing Plaintiff to take all necessary steps to effectuate service of the summons and complaint on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 1/2/2020. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for all Proceedings. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 12/31/2019. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance by Vickie LeDuc and Consent to Magistrate Judge on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tammy Murphy(Shea, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Shea, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Tammy Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Shea, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
