Robinson v. City of Mount Rainier Maryland et al
| Charnette I. Robinson |
| City of Mount Rainier Maryland, Bryan Knedler, Malinda Miles, John Hoatson, Miranda Braatz, Luke Chesek, Shivali Shah, Celina Benitez and Michael Theis |
| 8:2020cv00397 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Timothy J Sullivan |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Celina Benitez, Miranda Braatz, Luke Chesek, City of Mount Rainier Maryland, John Hoatson, Bryan Knedler, Malinda Miles, Shivali Shah, Michael Theis ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 84637035926.), filed by Charnette I. Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment, #3 Attachment, #4 Attachment 1, #5 Attachment 2, #6 Attachment 3a, #7 Attachment 3b, #8 Attachment, #9 Attachment 3c, #10 Attachment 4, #11 Attachment 5, #12 Attachment 5a, #13 Attachment, #14 Attachment, #15 Attachment 5b, #16 Attachment 5c, #17 Attachment 6, #18 Attachment 8, #19 Attachment 9, #20 Attachment 10, #21 Attachment 11, #22 Attachment 12, #23 Attachment 12, #24 Attachment 13, #25 Attachment 14, #26 Attachment 15, #27 Attachment 16, #28 Attachment, #29 Attachment, #30 Attachment 18, #31 Attachment, #32 Summons)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
