Beck v. Berryhill
| Jon-Peter Beck |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| SSA Notify |
| 8:2020cv00607 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Paula Xinis |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued 60 days as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 4/7/2020. (bus, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 3/10/2020. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance by Vickie LeDuc and Consent to Magistrate Judge on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jon-Peter L Beck(Lambros, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jon-Peter L Beck. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons to Attorney General, #3 Summons Summons to General Counsel, #4 Summons Summons to U.S. Attorney)(Lambros, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
