Orellana v. United States of America et al
| Evy B. Orellana |
| John Doe U.S. Marshals 1-2 and United States of America |
| 8:2020cv00845 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah K Chasanow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2672 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE by Evy B. Orellana re #1 Complaint, Summons to US Attorney for Maryland (Malek, Bobby)
|
|
Filing 3
QC NOTICE regarding: #1 Complaint, filed by Evy B. Orellana. **The following attachment is missing - Summons for the U.S. Attorney for Maryland. To correct this problem, file Summons for the U.S. Attorney for Maryland using the event Notice (Other) and link Summons for the U.S. Attorney for Maryland to #1 Complaint. Thank you. (tds, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Evy B. Orellana (Attachment: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (tds, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Evy B. Orellana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Information Sheet, #2 Supplement Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #3 Supplement Proposed Order to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #4 Summons Summons to Defendant United States of America, #5 Summons Summons to Defs. John Doe U.S. Marshals 1-2)(Malek, Bobby)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
