Wade v. Baltimore County Detention Center
Michael Wade |
Baltimore County Detention Center, Sergeant Willete and Officer Bond |
8:2020cv01362 |
June 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
George Jarrod Hazel |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Michael Wade. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Michael Wade. (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Document) (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Finance Officer re: Michael Wade (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Document) (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 ORDER directing Clerk to add Officer Bond and Sergeant Willete as Defendants; granting the Plaintiff 28 days to name additional defendants should he intend to; Directing BCDC Finance officer to file an inmate account summary information sheet and certificate within 21 days.. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 6/17/2020. (c/m 6/18/2020 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Wade(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baltimore County Detention Center, filed by Michael Wade. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.