Swaby v. Prince George's County, Maryland, et al
| Anthony George Swaby |
| PFC Vallette (Badge No. 3956), PFC Roch (Badge No. 3829) and Prince George's County, Maryland |
| 8:2020cv01493 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
LETTER ORDER Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 6/5/2020. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Prince George's County, Maryland, Vallette (Badge No. 3956). (Attachments: #1 Summons)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by Anthony George Swaby was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Summons for Defendant, PFC Roach. To correct this problem, file Summons for Defendant, PFC Roach using the event Notice (Other) and link Summons for Defendant, PFC Roach to #1 Complaint. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Case reassigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. Judge Ellen L. Hollander no longer assigned to the case. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony George swaby ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8684592.), filed by Anthony George swaby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Leyden, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
