Jackson v. Warden
| James Jackson, James A. Jackson, Travis Fullard, Sa, James Anthony Jackson, Derek Jackson and Travis M. Fullard |
| Warden |
| 8:2020cv01915 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Dismissing without Prejudice #1 , #2 , and #3 Motions for Relief from Judgment; a Certificate of Appealability shall not issue; directing the Clerk to Amend the docket and to close this case. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/17/2020. (c/m 8/17/2020 heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/17/2020. (c/m 8/17/2020 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Case reassigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. Judge George Levi Russell, III no longer assigned to the case. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Amended for Relief from Judgment by James Jackson (Attachments: #1 Order of Court, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Amend Judgment by James Jackson(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James Jackson.(jb5, Deputy Clerk). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/26/2020: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (jb5, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
