Capital Bank, NA v. Potomac Development 3117 35th Street, LLC et al
| Capital Bank, NA |
| Matthew Shkor and Potomac Development 3117 35th Street, LLC |
| 8:2020cv02401 |
| August 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Charles B Day |
| Peter J Messitte |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day for Reviewing a Complaint for Judgment by Confession. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 8/25/2020. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 Supplemental to #1 Complaint,, filed by Capital Bank, NA Entry of Judgment by Confession (Attachments: #1 Supplement Notice of Entry of Judgment by Confession)(Anderson, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Capital Bank, NA against Potomac Development 3117 35th Street, LLC and Matthew Shkor against Capital Bank, NA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8816929.), filed by Capital Bank, NA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Promissory Note and Modification, #2 Exhibit B Appointment of Substitute Attorney in Fac, #3 Exhibit C Default Letter, #4 Exhibit D Guaranty of Payment, #5 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Complaint, #6 Attachment DOD manpower report, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons Summons for Potomac Development 3117 35th Street, LLC, #9 Summons Summons for Matthew Shkor, #10 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
