Fuentes-Rodriguez v. Donald Trump et al
| Rogelio Fuentes-Rodriguez |
| Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte, Donald Trump, William O'Bryant, Bryan S. Pitman and William Barr |
| 8:2020cv02661 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Peter J Messitte |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rogelio Fuentes-Rodriguez (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Rogelio Fuentes-Rodriguez(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rogelio Fuentes-Rodriguez(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bryan S. Pitman, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte, Donald Trump, Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, William Barr, William O'Bryant, filed by Rogelio Fuentes-Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit 10, #13 Exhibit 11, #14 Summons)(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/15/2020: #15 Affidavit) (jj2s, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
