Whitfield Briggs v. Western Express, Inc.
| Yvonne Whitfield Briggs |
| Western Express, Inc. |
| 8:2020cv02781 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RETURN PLEADING NOTICE. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 11/12/2020. (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Document)(c/m 11/17/2020 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Sullivan for Settlement. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 11/13/2020. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 12 Settlement Conference - requesting (Stewart, Ellen) |
| Filing 11 Correspondence from Plaintiff Requesting Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 4/2/2021. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 10/26/2020. (c/m 10/26/2020 heps, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 10/26/2020 (heps, Deputy Clerk).
|
| Filing 9 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Yvonne Whitfield Briggs (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 8 Correspondence re: Statement Concerning Removal (Stewart, Ellen) |
|
Filing 7
Standing Order Concerning Removal re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Western Express, Inc.. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 9/28/2020. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 Removal Notification correspondence from the Clerk to Pro-se Plaintiff. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 Local Rule 103.5 Certificate.(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 State Court Complaint by Western Express, Inc.(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Western Express, Inc. filed by Yvonne Whitfield Briggs.(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3-5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Western Express, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Western Express, Inc. for Western Express, Inc..(Marshall, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Prince George's County, case number CAL 20-14912. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8878983), filed by Western Express, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Attachment Cert. of Filing, #6 Attachment 103.5)(Marshall, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whitfield Briggs v. Western Express, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Western Express, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Stephen J Marshall |
| Represented By: | Ellen Renee Stewart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yvonne Whitfield Briggs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
