Dixon v. Baltimore County Detention Center et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Dixon
Defendant: Baltimore County Detention Center, Dr.Herman and Prime Care Health Inc.
Case Number: 8:2020cv02806
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Theodore D Chuang
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to electronically send copy of Complaint and withhold service; DIRECTING counsel for defendants to notify court if service is accepted and to answer the Complaint ( re #1 Complaint filed by Joseph Dixon ). Attachments will be emailed to attorneys who have not entered their appearance and were sent this NEF. Attorneys should contact the court if they do not receive the attachments; denying without prejudice #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 11/19/2020. (c/m 11/20/2020 nus, Deputy Clerk)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing The Baltimore County Department of Corrections fiscal administrator to file within 21 days of the date of this Order, an inmate account certificate.Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 10/22/2020. (c/m jj2s, Deputy Clerk)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Joseph Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(heps, Deputy Clerk)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 10/5/2020. (c/m jj2s, Deputy Clerk)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph Dixon(jj2s, Deputy Clerk)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baltimore County Detention Center, Dr.Herman, Prime Care Health Inc., filed by Joseph Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Exhibit)(jj2s, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. Baltimore County Detention Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baltimore County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr.Herman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prime Care Health Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Dixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?