Harris v. Quay et al
| RANDOLPH S. HARRIS |
| The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and WARDEN QUAY |
| 8:2020cv02894 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER directing Respondents to file an Answer on or before 40 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 12/4/2020. (c/m as directed 12/4/2020 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 Transfer notification letter. (c/m jj2s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Eastern; Case Number 2:20-cv-04080. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT THIS CASE IS TRANSFERRED TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1406.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 9/8/20. 9/8/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(jpd,)
|
| Document #3 mailed to pro se petitioner. (kw, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PPE218244 (dmc, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY filed by RANDOLPH S. HARRIS. *NO FILING FEE OR IFP. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Case Management Track Form)(jaa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
