Fisher v. Saul
| Mary Fisher |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Notify |
| 8:2020cv03336 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Paula Xinis |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number 0416-8989718(Murahari, Arjun) |
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; GRANTING plaintiff 30 days to pay the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 11/19/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Andrew M. Saul. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for all Proceedings. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 11/18/2020. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Murahari, Arjun) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mary Fisher(Murahari, Arjun) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Mary Fisher. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Murahari, Arjun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
