Watkins v. Saul
| Candace Watkins |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Notify |
| 8:2020cv03344 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number 0416-9037244(Shea, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting Plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order to remit $200 filing fee, payable to the "Clerk of Court"; staying this case pending remittance of the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 11/30/2020. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for all Proceedings. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 11/19/2020. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly M Marzullo and Consent to Magistrate Judge on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Candace Watkins(Shea, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 2
Consent to Magistrate Judge (Shea, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Candace Watkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Shea, Stephen)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
