Stevens v. Charles County, Maryland et al
Plaintiff: John Stevens and John H. Stevens
Defendant: Charles County, Maryland and Mark Belton
Case Number: 8:2020cv03522
Filed: December 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Theodore D Chuang
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MARGINAL ORDER granting #13 STATUS REPORT Joint Request for Modification to the Scheduling Order; Status Report due by 7/11/2021. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 1/25/2021. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Case Management Conference held on 1/25/2021 before Judge Theodore D. Chuang (FTR 4A.) (dhs, Deputy Clerk)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PAPERLESS NOTICE. The RULE 16 CONFERENCE scheduled for January 20, 2021 is rescheduled for January 25, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. To join the call at the scheduled time: (1) Dial 1-888-557-8511. (2) Enter access code 3008173, followed by the # key. You will then be placed on hold until Chambers dials into the call, at which point you will be prompted to enter a security code. (3) When prompted, enter security code 01250200 followed by the # key. The call will be recorded, so please do not use speakerphones as they compromise sound quality. Also, we ask that parties not remain on the conference line after the Judge has left the call, to ensure that the line is free for other calls that may be on the Judge's calendar. The parties are reminded that they should be prepared to address whether they consent to have all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge and whether they wish to participate in a mediation session with a Magistrate Judge, whether before, during, or after discovery. Parties are expected to consult with their clients and confer with each other on these issues in advance of the Rule 16 Case Management Conference and, if possible, present joint views to the Court. (tms, Chambers)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STATUS REPORT Joint Request for Modification to the Scheduling Order and Initial Joint Status Report by Mark Belton(Cornbrooks, Ernest)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS NOTICE. The RULE 16 CONFERENCE scheduled for January 13, 2021 is rescheduled for January 20, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. To join the call at the scheduled time: (1) Dial 1-888-557-8511. (2) Enter access code 3008173, followed by the # key. You will then be placed on hold until Chambers dials into the call, at which point you will be prompted to enter a security code. (3) When prompted, enter security code 01200300 followed by the # key. The call will be recorded, so please do not use speakerphones as they compromise sound quality. Also, we ask that parties not remain on the conference line after the Judge has left the call, to ensure that the line is free for other calls that may be on the Judge's calendar. The parties are reminded that they should be prepared to address whether they consent to have all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge and whether they wish to participate in a mediation session with a Magistrate Judge, whether before, during, or after discovery. Parties are expected to consult with their clients and confer with each other on these issues in advance of the Rule 16 Case Management Conference and, if possible, present joint views to the Court. (tms, Chambers)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS NOTICE. A RULE 16 CONFERENCE is scheduled for January 13, 2021 at 3:30 p.m. To join the call at the scheduled time: (1) Dial 1-888-557-8511. (2) Enter access code 3008173, followed by the # key. You will then be placed on hold until Chambers dials into the call, at which point you will be prompted to enter a security code. (3) When prompted, enter security code 01130330 followed by the # key. The call will be recorded, so please do not use speakerphones as they compromise sound quality. Also, we ask that parties not remain on the conference line after the Judge has left the call, to ensure that the line is free for other calls that may be on the Judge's calendar. The parties are reminded that they should be prepared to address whether they consent to have all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge and whether they wish to participate in a mediation session with a Magistrate Judge, whether before, during, or after discovery. Parties are expected to consult with their clients and confer with each other on these issues in advance of the Rule 16 Case Management Conference and, if possible, present joint views to the Court. (tms, Chambers)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Charles County, Maryland (Karpinski, Kevin)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 6/11/2021. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 12/28/2020. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Mark Belton (Cornbrooks, Ernest)
December 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mark Belton.(Cornbrooks, Ernest)
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Charles County, Maryland.(Karpinski, Kevin)
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John H. Stevens. Charles County, Maryland served on 12/7/2020, answer due 12/28/2020.(Ray, James)
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John H. Stevens. Mark Belton served on 12/7/2020, answer due 12/28/2020.(Ray, James)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 12/7/2020. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Mark Belton, Charles County, Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-8995260.), filed by John Stevens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Charles County, Maryland, #3 Summons Belton)(Ray, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevens v. Charles County, Maryland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Stevens
Represented By: James Martin Ray, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John H. Stevens
Represented By: James Martin Ray, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles County, Maryland
Represented By: Kevin Bock Karpinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Belton
Represented By: Ernest I Cornbrooks, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?