Wade et al v. CBH Health, LLC.
| Harold Wade, Tequila Myers and Harold Marvin Wade |
| Robert Litman, CBH Health, LLC. and Barton Azwalinsky |
| 8:2020cv03573 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by CBH Health, LLC. identifying Corporate Parent CenExel Clinical Research, Inc. for CBH Health, LLC..(Abbott, Courtney) |
| Filing 5 Defendant ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Barton Azwalinsky, CBH Health, LLC., Robert Litman.(Abbott, Courtney) |
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Extension. Defendants' Answer or otherwise Response to the Complaint is extended until January 15, 2021. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 1/6/2021. (tb2s, Chambers)
|
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Barton Azwalinsky, CBH Health, LLC., Robert Litman (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Abbott, Courtney) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Barton Azwalinsky, CBH Health, LLC., Robert Litman.(dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9004836.), filed by Harold Wade. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Spencer, Deyka) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
