Almeida v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Manuel M. Almeida |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA Notify |
| 8:2020cv03579 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 id |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for all Proceedings. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 12/18/2020. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Beiser, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 3
Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 12/11/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9006217.), filed by Manuel M. Almeida. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Beiser, Jonathan) |
| PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
