LeFande v. Mische-Hoeges
| Matthew August LeFande |
| Carolyn Anne Mische-Hoeges |
| 8:2020mc00291 |
| June 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION of Foreign Judgment. (Filing fee $47, receipt number 846370), filed by Carolyn Anne Mische-Hoeges. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Opinion and Order, #2 Envelope)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LeFande v. Mische-Hoeges | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carolyn Anne Mische-Hoeges | |
| Represented By: | Billy B Ruhling, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew August LeFande | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
