Evans v. Cantor Insurance Group, LP.
Plaintiff: Nathan Arthur Evans
Defendant: CANTOR INSURANCE GROUP LP and Cantor Insurance Group, LP.
Case Number: 8:2021cv00617
Filed: March 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: George Jarrod Hazel
Referring Judge: Paula Xinis
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of David A Paul. Directing attorney David A Paul to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2021. (mh4, Deputy Clerk)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Virginia Cardenas. Directing attorney Virginia Cardenas to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2021. (mh4, Deputy Clerk)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David A. Paul (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-9255865.) by Cantor Insurance Group, LP.(Kozlowski, Nicole)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Virginia Cardenas (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-9255832.) by Cantor Insurance Group, LP.(Kozlowski, Nicole)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole Marie Kozlowski on behalf of Cantor Insurance Group, LP. (Kozlowski, Nicole)
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nathan Arthur Evans. Cantor Insurance Group, LP. served on 4/26/2021, answer due 5/17/2021.(Mead, Christopher)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Reassigned to Judge George Jarrod Hazel. Judge Paula Xinis no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Cantor Insurance Group, LP.(heps, Deputy Clerk)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CANTOR INSURANCE GROUP LP ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9151028.), filed by Nathan Arthur Evans. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Mead, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evans v. Cantor Insurance Group, LP.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Arthur Evans
Represented By: Christopher B Mead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CANTOR INSURANCE GROUP LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cantor Insurance Group, LP.
Represented By: Virginia Jessica Cardenas
Represented By: David A Paul
Represented By: Nicole Marie Kozlowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?