Spriggs v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
| Ricardo Spriggs |
| Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Syngenta AG |
| 8:2021cv00908 |
| April 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued 21 days as to Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC.(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Ricardo Spriggs re #1 Complaint Summons (Attachments: #1 Summons Syngenta AG, #2 Summons Syngenta Crop Protection LLC)(Miller, Michael) |
| Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by Ricardo Spriggs was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Summons. To correct this problem, file Summons using the event Notice (Other) and link Summons to #1 . (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Patrick A. Luff (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-9215943.) by Ricardo Spriggs(Miller, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9215915.), filed by Ricardo Spriggs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Michael) |
| Case Assigned to Judge George Jarrod Hazel. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
