Abdallah et al v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
| Abdel R Abdallah and Ahmad M Abdallah |
| Real Time Resolutions, Inc. |
| 8:2021cv00946 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Abdel R Abdallah, Ahmad M Abdallah (Willard, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Abdel R Abdallah, Ahmad M Abdallah. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Extension of Time to Oppose Motion Through June 7, 2021)(Willard, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Abdel R Abdallah, Ahmad M Abdallah. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Additional Time ti File Answer to Motion to Dismiss)(Willard, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE re #6 Standing Order Concerning Removal -Statement of Removing Party filed by Real Time Resolutions, Inc..(Beiramee, Bizhan) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Beiramee, Bizhan) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (Beiramee, Bizhan) |
Filing 6
Standing Order Concerning Removal re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 4/19/2021. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 STATE COURT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT COMPLAINT against Real Time Resolutions, Inc., filed by Ahmad M Abdallah, Abdel R Abdallah. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Case Information Report, #7 Writ of Summons)(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (5-5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Supplemental to #1 Notice of Removal filed by Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pleadings from Circuit Court, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Samuel Trakhtenbroit, #3 Exhibit Ex 1 to Ex B- Promissory Note, #4 Exhibit Tax Assessment, #5 Exhibit Notice of Notice of Removal filed in Circuit Court)(Beiramee, Bizhan) |
| Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Real Time Resolutions, Inc. was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Civil Cover Sheet. To correct this problem, file Civil Cover Sheet using the event Notice (Other) and link Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Notice of Removal. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Real Time Resolutions, Inc. was filed incorrectly. . Each attachment or exhibit must be specifically labeled (i.e. complaint, summons, etc). Please refile each attachment using the "Other Documents" category, select the "Supplemental" event, and link filing to #1 Notice of Removal. The first labeled attachment can be the main document and the other labeled documents as separate attachments. File any pending motions as separate docket entries. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Montgomery County, case number 484615V. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9225596), filed by Real Time Resolutions, Inc..(Beiramee, Bizhan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
