Loftin v. Protective Insurance
Plaintiff: Marcus O. Loftin
Defendant: Marcus D. Pouncey, Protective Insurance and Susan Francis Davis
Case Number: 8:2021cv00992
Filed: April 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: George Jarrod Hazel
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2021 Filing 8 STATUS REPORT Concerning Removal by Protective Insurance(Bowen, Renee)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 4/22/2021. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 22, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Defendants Pouncey and Davis ONLY by Marcus O. Loftin (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 22, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Complaint by Protective Insurance.(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 22, 2021 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Susan Francis Davis, Marcus D. Pouncey, Protective Insurance, filed by Marcus O. Loftin.(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 22, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew T Stephenson on behalf of Protective Insurance Company (Stephenson, Andrew)
April 22, 2021 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Protective Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Protective Insurance Company for Protective Insurance Company.(Stephenson, Andrew)
April 22, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Action from Circuit Court for Prince George's County, case number CAL21-02050. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9237530), filed by Protective Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 -Writ of Summons for Protective Insurance filed in State Court, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Complaint filed in State Court, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Answer filed in State Court, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Partial Dismissal filed in State Court, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Notice of Filing Removal in State Court)(Bowen, Renee)
April 22, 2021 THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (4-6) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loftin v. Protective Insurance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcus D. Pouncey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Protective Insurance
Represented By: Andrew T Stephenson
Represented By: Renee Bowen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Francis Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus O. Loftin
Represented By: Thomas Wilson Farrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?