Reutemann et al v. AffirmX LLC et al
Plaintiff: John F. Reutemann, Jr. and Malcolm Road Associates Limited Partnership
Defendant: AffirmX LLC and Kenneth F. Wolff
Case Number: 8:2021cv02191
Filed: August 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Deborah K Chasanow
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by AffirmX LLC, Kenneth F. Wolff (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Remus, Charles)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER APPROVING #5 Stipulation extending the due date for Defendants' response to Plaintiffs' complaint to October 11, 2021. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 9/17/2021. (Chasanow, Deborah)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer by AffirmX LLC, Kenneth F. Wolff(Remus, Charles) Modified on 9/16/2021 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk).
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Edward Remus, II on behalf of All Defendants (Remus, Charles)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to AffirmX LLC, Kenneth F. Wolff. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Malcolm Road Associates Limited Partnership identifying Other Affiliate Entity Management LLC for Malcolm Road Associates Limited Partnership.(Friedman, Greg)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9458785.), filed by John F. Reutemann, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Attachments to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons AffirmX LLC Summons, #4 Summons Kenneth Wolff Summons)(Friedman, Greg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reutemann et al v. AffirmX LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John F. Reutemann, Jr.
Represented By: Greg Stuart Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malcolm Road Associates Limited Partnership
Represented By: Greg Stuart Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AffirmX LLC
Represented By: Charles Edward Remus, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth F. Wolff
Represented By: Charles Edward Remus, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?