Valdez et al v. VE-H2 General Services, LLC et al
COSME ROMEO SOTO VALDEZ and VESENIA VISNEY AVILA AVILA |
VE-H2 GENERAL SERVICES LLC, VANILLE F. DE ARAUJO ABREU and VE-H2 General Services, LLC |
8:2021cv02893 |
November 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Charles B Day |
George Jarrod Hazel |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claimand/or for Summary Judgment by Vanille F. De Araujo Abreu, VE-H2 General Services, LLC (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Affidavit Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Rogerio Moreira, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Summary of Valdez Hours, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Summary of Avila Hours)(Lyford-Pike, Roy) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 12/27/2021. (jw2s, Chambers) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #7 Summons Returned Executed, #8 Summons Returned Executed by Vanille F. De Araujo Abreu, VE-H2 General Services, LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lyford-Pike, Roy) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Roy Lyford-Pike on behalf of All Defendants (Lyford-Pike, Roy) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cosme Romeo Soto Valdez. VE-H2 General Services, LLC served on 12/6/2021, answer due 12/27/2021.(Balashov, Andrew) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cosme Romeo Soto Valdez. Vanille F. De Araujo Abreu served on 12/6/2021, answer due 12/27/2021.(Balashov, Andrew) |
Case Reassigned to Judge George Jarrod Hazel. Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day no longer assigned to the case. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 11/12/2021. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day. Vesenia Visney Avila Avila, Cosme Romeo Soto Valdez or counsel for Vesenia Visney Avila Avila, Cosme Romeo Soto Valdez are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 11/29/2021. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Vanille F. De Araujo Abreu, VE-H2 General Services, LLC.(dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Supplemental to #1 Complaint, filed by VESENIA VISNEY AVILA AVILA, COSME ROMEO SOTO VALDEZ CORRECTED SUMMONSES WITH CASE NUMBER (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Melehy, Omar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9601182.), filed by COSME ROMEO SOTO VALDEZ, VESENIA VISNEY AVILA AVILA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Abreu, #3 Summons VE-H2)(Melehy, Omar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.