Tang v. Altimmune, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: De-Chu Christopher Tang
Defendant: Altimmune, Inc., Vipin K. Garg and David J. Drutz
Case Number: 8:2021cv03283
Filed: December 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Paul W Grimm
Referring Judge: Gina L Simms
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Filing 15 QC NOTICE: #11 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement filed by Altimmune, Inc., Vipin K. Garg, David J. Drutz was filed incorrectly. **When docketing the Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement, the corporate parent and/or affiliates MUST be entered when prompted by CM/ECF to do so. Please re-file a CORRECTED Disclosure Statement. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 18, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Morgan Mordecai (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-9769764.) by Altimmune, Inc., David J. Drutz, Vipin K. Garg(Burgess, Brian)
February 18, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Tucker DeVoe (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-9769755.) by Altimmune, Inc., David J. Drutz, Vipin K. Garg(Burgess, Brian)
February 18, 2022 Filing 11 [FILED IN ERROR] Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Altimmune, Inc., David J. Drutz, Vipin K. Garg (Burgess, Brian) Modified on 2/18/2022 (dg3s, Deputy Clerk).
February 18, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Burgess on behalf of All Defendants (Burgess, Brian)
February 18, 2022 Case Reassigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms no longer assigned to the case. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 14, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by De-Chu Christopher Tang. Altimmune, Inc. served on 2/3/2022, answer due 2/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 1/27/2022. (c/m 1/27/2022 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 27, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Gina L. Simms. De-Chu Christopher Tang or counsel for De-Chu Christopher Tang are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 2/10/2022. (c/m 1/27/2022 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 27, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued 21 days as to Altimmune, Inc., David J. Drutz, Vipin K. Garg.(c/m 1/27/2022 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the clerk to issue summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 1/26/2022. (c/m 1/27/2022 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 25, 2022 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 84637038106 (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing Plaintiff to pay the full filing fee by 2/2/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 1/12/2022. (c/m 1/12/2022 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 23, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by De-Chu Christopher Tang(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Altimmune, Inc., David J. Drutz, Vipin K. Garg, filed by De-Chu Christopher Tang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tang v. Altimmune, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: De-Chu Christopher Tang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altimmune, Inc.
Represented By: Brian Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vipin K. Garg
Represented By: Brian Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David J. Drutz
Represented By: Brian Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?