DeWolfe v. WACO Inc.,
Plaintiff: Constance DeWolfe
Defendant: WACO Inc.,
Case Number: 8:2022cv00311
Filed: February 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Paula Xinis
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #11 Request for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's Response to #8 MOTION to Dismiss is EXTENDED to April 25, 2022. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 3/21/2022. (tb2s, Chambers)
March 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File (Akpan, Imoh)
March 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric F Rosenberg on behalf of Constance DeWolfe (Rosenberg, Eric)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Rule 12/56 notice mailed to Constance DeWolfe (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by WACO Inc., (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memo of Points & Authorities, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Akpan, Imoh)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Correspondence re: Statement Concerning Removal (Akpan, Imoh)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by WACO Inc., identifying Corporate Parent Primo-Con Inc., for WACO Inc.,.(Akpan, Imoh)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Removal Notification Letter (c/m 2/7/2022 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 2/8/2022 (mg3s, Deputy Clerk).
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against WACO Inc.,, filed by Constance DeWolfe.(mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ST. MARY'S COUNTY. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5(Akpan, Imoh)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Mary's County, case number C-18-CV-21-000335. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9737331), filed by WACO Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Writ of Summons, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Civil Case Information Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Fed. Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Attachment Certificate of Filing to Adverse Parties)(Akpan, Imoh)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Paula Xinis. (ko, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeWolfe v. WACO Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constance DeWolfe
Represented By: Eric F Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WACO Inc.,
Represented By: Imoh Emmanuel Akpan
Represented By: Franshun Attilah Vann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?